Saturday, February 9, 2008

What It Means

Right now, I am trying not to be overly obsessed with the Constitutional election. Last night I received the call, the news was not good, and upon hanging up settled down on the couch in front of my fireplace and hit the play button. The film I watched was “3:10 to Yuma”, with Russell Crowe and Christian Bale, two of my favorite actors, if anybody is interested. Back in 1996 I took a film class at the University of New Orleans, and the original “3:10 to Yuma” was one of the flicks we dissected, starring then Glenn Ford and Van Heflin. Appropriately, both versions deal heavily in psychology, which fit my neurotic mood after getting such depressing news.
I awoke this morning at 5:00 a.m., earlier than usual, and with less than 6 hours of sleep. My mind simply would not let go. For some reason a racing mind means a sleepless body. That was the case.
It is tempting right now to say something like “It’s hard to make sense of this mess!” The reality though is that it all makes perfect sense. Most Tribal members who cared to vote on this issue wanted change. In fact, if you average out the three percentages of amendments A, B, and C—78%, 60%, and 55%, what you get is somewhere in the mid-60 percentile region, which is a lopsided in any kind of election. But the old two-thirds majority requirement of our Constitution, that is matters the most.
The real question that people need to be asking themselves now is simply “Is that it?” Is it end of story, game over, etc.? Personally, I can’t quite buy that right now, for the simple reason that even the least successful of the amendments, Part C, at 55% is the kind of percentage anybody would take in their cause. I’m sure any of the presidential candidates right now would like that kind of percentage, as would anybody running for Council even. To say the “the people have spoken” or anything like that would not carry much weight because, once again, most who voted wanted change. Had the membership rejected the amendments, say 70% to 30%, I wouldn’t even be bothering writing this post. What could I say? But that isn’t what happened, and that’s what is so frustrating right now.
Given the circumstances, the amendments fared quite well. The neglected effort to clear up misconceptions about the enrollment issue by Tribal leadership, which I know includes me but my criticism still stands, could have very well been the difference in this election. I will always believe that the half-hearted effort put forth in all this was far from innocent.
I guess what I’m left with right now is “What next?” Does the issue simply die, or do the results speak to future opportunities? My own hunch is the latter, but then again I haven’t devoted the last nine years of my life to this issue as some people have. What I’m feeling right now is mild in comparison, no doubt.

5 comments:

Unknown said...

Chris, you were not the only restless one. Many others could not sleep either.
I spent quite some time looking at visitors to the GROL website. (Thank you for posting the ballot results). Each visitor has a different story, but most of them have children, siblings, or more distant relatives that are still not welcomed into the Tribal home. These are the people that could not sleep. These are the people that had other phone calls to make to deliver the election results.

The treaties gave our ancestors the right to have their descendents enrolled in the Tribe. The policy created since that time are what have our own Grand Ronde people.

The impetuous that was needed for the amendments to pass was the same type of promotion that was given in the 1999 election. We needed a spokesperson to write columns supporting these amendments in the Smoke Signals and the Tilixam Wawa. In 1999, Kathryn Harrison appeared several times in the news, both public and Grand Ronde news encouraging the passage of that amendment. Why did not one politically influential person make a public statement for all the people to hear?
The best thing to come of this -in spite of all the non-support and mis-information circulated, the majority of the voters did want to see the changes made.

Jennifer O'Neal said...

What is the GROL website?

Unknown said...

Jennifer,

GROL is a myfamily.com website created for Grand Ronde families to share ideas, pictures, news, family trees, etc. The GROL administrator is cen15752@centurytel.net. Send them an email requesting a password.

Yetiva or email me with your email address and I will forward it to GROL. My email is
yallen@gfn.org

Yetiva

Chris Mercier said...

Yetiva,

That is one of the things I kick myself for not doing. I certainly was working in other ways, but should have done that. Of course, I am not sure in the present political climate if any letter I would have written would have even been published in "Smoke Signals" and sure as hell not "Tilixam Wawa". But in hindsight, it is definitely something that should have been done.
It is probably egotistical of me to think that a simple letter by me would have made a difference, but had a bunch of us done so, well, I think you would have seen results.
There is probably a lot that many of us could have done to make a difference. Who knows? Maybe we'll get another chance. What I got from Sunday's General Council Meeting in Portland is that this is not over.

Chris

Unknown said...

I also think that one letter signed by you, Kathleen Tom, Angie Blackwell, Andy Jenness, and any other prominent person who supported the enrollment proposals would have made the difference, Chris.

Let's hope as you say this issue is not over yet.

Rosemary