Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Camera Happy



Okay, so maybe I am just looking to post anything here, since I haven't had much time to write these past two weeks. Either way, I love Oregon and the seasons. These photos were taken less than three weeks apart. One was a snow day, the other a balmy 61 degree Sunday before President's Day. Yes, that is Mt. Hood, far as I know. For some readers here, snow is probably no big deal. But in the Willamette Valley, you kind of have to get out there and enjoy it. The snow seldom lasts very long.



Saturday, February 9, 2008

What It Means

Right now, I am trying not to be overly obsessed with the Constitutional election. Last night I received the call, the news was not good, and upon hanging up settled down on the couch in front of my fireplace and hit the play button. The film I watched was “3:10 to Yuma”, with Russell Crowe and Christian Bale, two of my favorite actors, if anybody is interested. Back in 1996 I took a film class at the University of New Orleans, and the original “3:10 to Yuma” was one of the flicks we dissected, starring then Glenn Ford and Van Heflin. Appropriately, both versions deal heavily in psychology, which fit my neurotic mood after getting such depressing news.
I awoke this morning at 5:00 a.m., earlier than usual, and with less than 6 hours of sleep. My mind simply would not let go. For some reason a racing mind means a sleepless body. That was the case.
It is tempting right now to say something like “It’s hard to make sense of this mess!” The reality though is that it all makes perfect sense. Most Tribal members who cared to vote on this issue wanted change. In fact, if you average out the three percentages of amendments A, B, and C—78%, 60%, and 55%, what you get is somewhere in the mid-60 percentile region, which is a lopsided in any kind of election. But the old two-thirds majority requirement of our Constitution, that is matters the most.
The real question that people need to be asking themselves now is simply “Is that it?” Is it end of story, game over, etc.? Personally, I can’t quite buy that right now, for the simple reason that even the least successful of the amendments, Part C, at 55% is the kind of percentage anybody would take in their cause. I’m sure any of the presidential candidates right now would like that kind of percentage, as would anybody running for Council even. To say the “the people have spoken” or anything like that would not carry much weight because, once again, most who voted wanted change. Had the membership rejected the amendments, say 70% to 30%, I wouldn’t even be bothering writing this post. What could I say? But that isn’t what happened, and that’s what is so frustrating right now.
Given the circumstances, the amendments fared quite well. The neglected effort to clear up misconceptions about the enrollment issue by Tribal leadership, which I know includes me but my criticism still stands, could have very well been the difference in this election. I will always believe that the half-hearted effort put forth in all this was far from innocent.
I guess what I’m left with right now is “What next?” Does the issue simply die, or do the results speak to future opportunities? My own hunch is the latter, but then again I haven’t devoted the last nine years of my life to this issue as some people have. What I’m feeling right now is mild in comparison, no doubt.

Monday, February 4, 2008

Spare Time Again

As I sit here and write this little posting, one of my favorite shows, “Anthony Bourdain’s No Reservations” on the Travel Channel, is ending. For those of you not familiar with this program, Bourdain is a famous chef who is very snide, but creative and funny too. He has made a career out of traveling, eating, drinking liquor, and basically making it all into weekly television show. I had first heard of Bourdain in 2000 when he released a book titled “Kitchen Confidential” which supposedly revealed a number of trade secrets. Honestly, I’ve never read his book, but after watching his old show on the Food Network, “A Cook’s Tour”, he caught my attention. His job right now is basically my dream job.
The episode this week he traveled to New Orleans, and chose to focus on the rebuilding efforts, zeroing in on the resurrected restaurant industry, one that has been hit especially hard since Katrina. A food show in New Orleans would have to have a small cameo by Emeril LaGass, which it does. But that is hardly the highlight. Perhaps the most interesting moment comes from the anecdote of one owner who related and flashed photos of the disgusting remains of foodstuffs that would occupy the pantry and walk-in freezers of his former restaurant. Funny how I would never even think about something like that.
I would recommend “No Reservations” for anybody who likes travel, humor and food. It’s on a few times per week on the Travel Channel. Monday nights are the new episodes.

“No Country for Old Men” (2007)

I can’t really say that any movie by the Coen brothers has ever disappointed me. Once in a while they may go overboard with the token eccentricities, but usually the films the two brothers make are solid. I haven’t read Cormac McCarthy’s book with the same title, but after seeing this film his books can be expected to join my list.
“No Country” is different from the Coen brothers’ other films because it is unusually dark, and with much less humor and quirkiness then usual. Josh Brolin plays kind of an average joe, though a Vietnam vet, who stumbles upon a drug scene circa 1980 while hunting and finds corpses and a ton of cash. He takes the money of course and ends up being chased across Texas by a hitman played by Spanish actor Javier Bardem, who in turn ends up being pursued by sheriff Tommy Lee Jones and (briefly) bounty hunter Woody Harrelson. This is really a study in characters, as Brolin is clearly in over his head and Jones is mystified at how explicably violent this whole case becomes. Bardem is so twisted, psychotic, mellow and quiet that that you end up chuckling during a couple of scenes because he is just plain wrong in the head and there is something sickly amusing about his character.
I would not be surprised if this movie won an Oscar for Best Picture, and Bardem won for Best Supporting Actor. Admittedly though, this movie is not for everybody. But if you like something different, here you go.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Yes or No

In all honesty, what I am writing now might not make a difference. Furthermore, I’ve been told by sources far from being authorities that a person in my position should maintain some sort of neutrality in this matter. I didn’t agree with that months and years ago, and I don’t agree with it now.
I plan on voting “yes” for two of the amendments proposed right now. Admittedly I am somewhat split on how to vote for amendment “A”, as I can see both sides of the issue. But in regards to “B” and “C”, I will vote “yes” on both of them with little if any hesitation.
I have a confession to make here. Years ago, as far back as 2002, maybe even earlier, I could not have given a rip about this issue. A lot of the catchphrases that are being tossed around these days by people who oppose the amendments, and boy have I heard a lot of them, really summed up how I felt. You know “Ah, they just wanna enroll for the money!” or “They had sixteen years to get enrolled (1983-1999), where were they before the casino opened?” and on and on and on. To this day, I can see why people might actually by into that line of thinking, because from a cold-blooded, unfeeling objective point of view, some of those arguments kind of make sense. I can’t honestly say that there aren’t people who want to enroll for the benefits. On the other hand, it often seems that much of the opposition is grounded in similar sentiments, i.e. people oppose it because they fear a dip in their benefits.
What changed my own mind was getting to know a lot of the people who have been adversely affected by the 1999 amendments. Noticed I used the word “people”, because that is what they are. They are families, with children, in fact some of them are children, and what they really want is fairness. I am personally not affected by the proposed amendment. Unless I have a child with another Tribal member, the blood ends at my grandchildren, regardless of how this Constitutional election goes. But I am affected by the 1999 amendment because I have seen a lot of the heartache, division, and ultimately sadness that change had, especially among people who are now good friends.
There are times when I really believe that in order to understand a person’s perspective and feelings you really have to be them, or find some way to magically put yourself in their shoes (or should I say moccasins). Movies and books have been crafted about that subject and there have been many days I wish it were possible, if not for myself at least others. I’ve done my best to try and imagine what it must be like to be one of those parents who has the split siblings. How do they handle that situation, do they wait until the kids come of age and have “the talk”? Do they make them split the trust fund? How do they explain to these kids how this situation arose? I’ve tried my best to visualize myself being part of those families and the feeling, assuming it is close to the real thing, is hardly fun.
A Tribal member who spoke at the December General Council meeting provided what I think was one of the clearest explanations of the problem. He simply said that his Tribal ID card showed “x” amount of blood, and that his kids should have half of that. If their quantum is at least 1/16th, they should be Tribal members. It should be that simple. Unfortunately, under our present requirements, that is hardly the way things go.
I am not going to lie and say that the wording in the amendments is perfect and would solve every single injustice regarding Tribal enrollment. But it is a step in the right direction. Most importantly, I don’t know if or when we will ever have the opportunity to vote on this again. That is why I plan on making the most of it, and hoping for change that counts.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Winter Gathering






The Chinooks really like to do things up every January at their annual gathering. Today was the second straight year I've made my way up to Ridgefield, Washington to partake. Eventually, I hope we get the chance to have such a plankhouse. Although you can't really tell from the photos, it was darn cold, hence the fires.
The final shot is a basket of wapato, a traditional food that tastes rather starchy when cooked, like potatoes. The bulbs were available for anybody who wanted to take one home and plant it.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

I Got a Name

I presently sit as the Tribe’s delegate to the Mid-Willamette Valley Council of Governments. In order to save some breath we generally refer to the body as COG, pronounced the way you would expect. The COG has been going strong for more than 50 years now. Its main function, really, is providing a chance for all the local governments—cities, towns, counties, school districts, tribes—to net work with one another. You never know what partnerships are out there. The COG also provides help to these bodies, like grants or consulting services, but those usually go to the governments that are more strapped for cash than others. The dues that each body pays depends on population. Grand Ronde’s is one of the lowest.
Not only am I the delegate but now my position includes that of Chair of the Executive Board. Last year I was Vice-Chair. Four of us rotate the position. Next year I will be a regular old board member.
Networking is important with so many disparate governments clustered together in the Willamette Valley. The various jurisdictions have a lot to offer one another, like help in projects, letters of support for eachother when asking for further funding, etc. Overall, I enjoy working with the COG, even though the Tribe probably doesn’t benefit from the Council the way it might have during the “poor” days, prior to Spirit Mountain Casino. The only thing I never really get used to is that there appears to be a visible age difference between not only me and the rest of the Executive Board, but the whole Council of Governments. I still get remarks about my “youth”, as if doing what I am doing at 32 is some sort of precedent. A couple of people still act as if they don’t quite know how to interact with me, the perceived generation gap possibly meaning I speak a different language.
At our last meeting in December, we had a guest speaker. He was from the League of Oregon Cities, and his topic was one that ended up being more fascinating as his presentation continued. That topic was recalls, and the focus was throughout Oregon over the years.
What I learned is that recalls are quite common within small communities. Willamina recalled its mayor a few years back. The city of Tualatin, if I remember correctly, recalled their own mayor two months ago. Carlton, a town only seven miles from where I live, just engaged in a failed recall effort on its mayor, a very smart woman who happens to be one of the other three people who sits on the COG Executive Board with me.
I asked our speaker about recalls in tribes. Everybody laughs as the only instant he can refer to was in Grand Ronde. Evidently he had been out at the Tribe some years ago and remembered a sign or booth being set up, might have been during pow wow. I chuckle because I am pretty sure I remember which one he is talking about.
Recalls, I learn, seldom succeed. A lot of that is because the rules for actually successfully making a recall happen are pretty tight. In addition, recalls cost money, and distract people. Ironically though, on some levels the recalls do succeed. Recalls are often one chapter of what is essentially political warfare being waged on an individual or group of people. Although I don’t remember the percentages off-hand, quite a few targets of recalls sometimes resign or don’t seek another term. The targets usually just get sick of the constant harassment, bullying, and/or bickering and give up entirely. The intent of the recall, to get rid of a public official, holds true.
I can remember when the recall effort was launched against my fellow COG Board member. It was emotionally draining for her, not to mention stressful. Above all it was personal, because there was nothing that I know of that she did within the course of her job which merited a recall. She is a person, with a name and life, same as anybody else.
When I think back on what happened during my swearing-in ceremony in September, and how much that angered me, questions start forming in my mind as to what else might be in store for me over the next three years. I often reflect on what Ed Pearsall had to endure his final 18 months. Not only did he have a recall effort launched against him, but there were a handful of Tribal members who looked to have made a hobby of harassing him, and heck that was just non-Council people. If ever there was a public effort to make somebody in Grand Ronde miserable, it was what was done to poor Ed back in 2002 and 2003. Often, this effort looked so scripted as well.
It takes a certain type to do this job. I would have a hard time giving up, as some people did according to the recall study. But there is no doubt that doing this job will age me somewhat.
Maybe if flecks of grey start appearing in my beard, and wrinkles upon my brow, the “young” comments will cease.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Other Tribes

There are a number of things that I've learned entering my fourth year on Council. One is that tribes are paradoxically, unique, but when you become familiar with some of the goings on in Indian country, there quite often are parallels. In other words, there are eerie similarities. I've included a link below from Wikipedia about what must really be darn close to a worst-case scenario in Tribal politics. The Cherokee website used to have a more in-depth file on all this, as I read it a couple of years ago. But Wikipedia here does a good job of summarizing what were probably the highlights of what appeared to be an all-out legal crisis that seemed to have resulted in a near-government shut down:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Byrd_(Cherokee_Chief)

I've also posted some results from the Umatilla Tribal elections down below:

Board of Trustees Chair
Gary Burke 237Antone Minthorn (I) 389
Board of Trustees Vice Chair
Alvina Huesties 144Leo Stewart (I) 486
Board of Trustees Treasurer
Les Minthorn (I) 343David Wolf, Jr. 293
Board of Trustees Secretary
Kathryn Brigham (I) 277Shawna Gavin 182Robert Shippentower 175
Board of Trustees Members at Large (4 positions)
Adele Guyer-Lynn 168Armand Minthorn (I) 352Jay Minthorn (I) 281Justin E. Quaempts 255William Quaempts (I) 339Jeanine Satterwhite 266Emmet Sheoships 138 Rosenda Shippentower (I) 417Jeff Van Pelt 194Write-in Alan Crawford 41
General Council Chair
John Barkley (I) 286Michael R. Johnson 321
General Council Vice-ChairAlthea Huesties-Wolf 433Write-in Woodrow Starr 34
General Council Secretaryno candidatesWrite-in Shawna Gavin 35
General Council Interpreterno candidatesWrite-in Fred Hill 116

Amendment A - Failed (224 For, 357 Against)Institutes Staggered Terms for Board Members, Changes the Length of Terms for Board Members and General Council Officers, and Returns to At-Large Election of All Board Members

Amendment B - Passed (312 For, 281 Against)Requires Tribal Elections to be by Secret Ballot, with Adequate Notice to All Voters and Providing Absentee Ballots

Amendment C - Passed (325 For, 275 Against)Removes Requirement that the Secretary of Interior Approve Constitutional Amendments Prior to their Taking Effect

Amendment D - Passed (350 For, 240 Against)Corrects Grammatical Errors and Inconsistencies in the Constitution

Amendment E - Failed (241 For, 344 Against)Explicitly Authorizes Closed Board Meetings to Address Confidential Matters

Amendment F - Passed (397 For, 189 Against)Preserves the Federal Government's Trust Obligations

I've often followed other Tribal elections with a slight interest. Umatilla's intrigued me because as you can see they too are looking at Constitutional amendments. One (Amendment C) is to remove BIA oversight in Constitutional amendments, the other Amendment E, and this is really fascinating with compared with how things are run in Grand Ronde right now, prohibits the Board/Council from closing their board meetings. A guy can dream, I suppose.